Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.

Secure Original On Schedule

Tiffany The Burlington Industries V. Ellerth concerns a salesperson, Ellerth, who quits her job having been subjected to a constant sexual assault by her supervisor Ted Slowik, a manager responsible for hiring and promoting employees. Ellerth cites incidents relative to her sexual harassment complaints, and even though she refused Ted’s advances, she never informed anyone in authority concerning the incident, given that she was aware the industries contained policies against sexual harassment. If I were the judge, I would have passed a ruling against Ellerth since, even though she refused the advances, she suffered no tangible job consequences. The court cites a similar ruling against Ellerth, with suggestions that under Title VII if an employee refuses sexual advancements and threatening harassment from the supervisor but does not suffer tangible job problems, the employee may recover against the employer without showing them their negligence or fault of their actions. In one way, Ellerth has not been discriminated against in her job place because she has refused sexual advancements. Also, if the plaintiff based their claims on a quid pro quo scenario, then the employer, Ted Slowik, would have been charged with vicarious liability. No less than 100 words and respond to this persons discussion

Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.

Secure Original On Schedule