Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.
Secure Original On Schedule
Respond to at least two colleagues by explaining whether you agree or disagree that the techniques identified by your colleague will result in successful termination. Identify potential consequences of early termination for families and groups.
Use the Learning Resources to support your posts. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
1-MASON-
Termination in both treatment groups and family therapy involves carefully assessing client progress and readiness to conclude services, but the processes differ in scope and relational dynamics. In a treatment group setting, evaluating readiness for termination typically focuses on collective goal attainment, each member’s ability to maintain new skills independently of the group context, and the degree of cohesion that has fostered mutual support (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). Group facilitators frequently assess whether members have developed sufficient problem-solving capacities and social support systems to address issues outside the group environment.
Conversely, in a family therapy context, readiness for termination centers on the family’s relational patterns, communication strategies, and the capacity for sustained change in the home system (Patterson et al., 2018). While both forms of treatment conclude when clients demonstrate consistent improvement, the group process often requires special attention to members’ sense of closure with one another. For example, a structured final session may include group reflections, mutual feedback, and shared commitments to post-therapy support. With families, terminating treatment usually entails discussing ongoing strategies for problem resolution, reinforcing healthy boundaries, and ensuring each family member’s concerns are addressed. Standard techniques—summarizing progress, celebrating successes, and preparing for potential challenges—are used in both contexts. However, in group work, the therapist mediates collective goodbyes and emphasizes resources for continued peer support. Family therapy focuses on reinforcing relationship dynamics and maintaining functional communication patterns without the therapist’s presence (Felton & Polowy, 2019). In each setting, open discussion regarding the termination timeline, clear articulation of goals met, and planning for future resources serve as essential elements to avoid feelings of abandonment and to ensure long-term success.
References
Felton, E. M., & Polowy, C. I. (2019, January 22). Termination: Ending the therapeutic relationship—Avoiding abandonment. National Association of Social Workers. https://naswcanews.org/termination-ending-the-therapeutic-relationship-avoiding-abandonment/Links to an external site.
Patterson, J., Williams, L., Edwards, T. M., Chamow, L., & Grauf-Grounds, C. (2018). Termination. In Essential skills in family therapy: From the first interview to termination (3rd ed., pp. 262–274). Guilford Press.
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Pearson
2-MIRANDA-
Post a comparison of the termination process between treatment groups and family sessions. Explain how you would evaluate readiness to terminate group and family treatment, identifying similarities and differences between the evaluation of the two types of treatment. Describe the techniques you would use to terminate a treatment group and how these may be the same or different than the techniques you would use to terminate a family intervention.
Termination is a critical phase in clinical practice that requires careful evaluation and planning to ensure an effective conclusion to treatment. The process differs between treatment groups and family sessions due to the unique dynamics, goals, and relationships formed within each context.
Evaluating readiness to terminate in both treatment groups and family sessions involves assessing whether the goals of the intervention have been met, as well as the emotional and functional preparedness of the members to move forward independently. For treatment groups, readiness can be evaluated by reviewing individual progress and the group’s ability to sustain its support system outside of the therapeutic environment (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). For instance, group members who demonstrate improved coping mechanisms, resilience, and a sense of closure may be considered ready for termination. In contrast, family sessions require assessing the family’s ability to communicate effectively, resolve conflicts, and maintain healthy dynamics without the facilitator’s support (Patterson et al., 2018). Families must also exhibit a shared understanding of their goals and mutual accountability.
While both contexts involve progress assessment, a key difference is the emphasis on group cohesion versus individual family members’ contributions to collective progress. Group readiness may involve addressing the unique interpersonal dynamics among members, whereas family readiness focuses on their ability to function as a cohesive unit.
The techniques for terminating treatment groups and family sessions share commonalities, such as emphasizing accomplishments, addressing unfinished business, and providing resources for ongoing support. For treatment groups, facilitating a celebratory final session where members reflect on their growth, share feedback, and recognize each other’s contributions is essential (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). Encouraging members to maintain connections outside the group, when appropriate, fosters continuity of support.
For family interventions, techniques focus on reinforcing positive communication patterns and problem-solving strategies learned during therapy. Role-playing and rehearsing conflict resolution can help families solidify their skills before the final session (Patterson et al., 2018). Additionally, families may benefit from a discussion of how to manage future challenges without therapeutic guidance.
One notable difference is the emotional intensity of the termination process. Treatment groups may experience a broader range of emotions due to the diverse perspectives and experiences of members. Facilitators must create space for each member to process their feelings individually and collectively. On the other hand, family sessions often focus on the shared emotional impact of termination and the importance of maintaining the therapeutic gains within their familial relationships.
References
Patterson, J., Williams, L., Edwards, T. M., Chamow, L., & Grauf-Grounds, C. (2018). Termination. In Essential skills in family therapy: From the first interview to termination (3rd ed., pp. 262–274). Guilford Press.
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Pearson.
Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Secure Original On Schedule