Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.
Secure Original On Schedule
Module 5 Discussion: Mixed Method Research
Purpose: This discussion aims to deepen your understanding of mixed method (MM) research and its relevance in nursing by exploring different types, paradigms, literature review processes, funding outlook, and dissemination mediums.
Class textbook: Nursing Research
ISBN: 9781975110659
Authors: Denise Polit, Cheryl Beck
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publication Date: 2019-12-09
Edition: 11th
Instructions:
Answer the following questions concisely in a traditional discussion post (typed responses with references):
Describe different types of mixed method (MM) research.
Why do paradigms matter in MM research? Share your thoughts.
How does conducting a literature review differ between qualitative, quantitative, and MM research?
What is the current outlook for funding MM research in nursing?
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various mediums for disseminating data (poster presentation, podium presentation, manuscript).
Post Requirements:
Be concise and to-the-point. This post should be 250 words or less.
Review the rubric for grading.
Check your posts for grammar, spelling, and sentence construction.
Follow APA guidelines for referencing.- references have to be 2020-2025 and only from googlescholar or pubmed
Comprehension, Reasoning and Synthesis of Advanced Nursing Content Evidence-based Practice (EBP)
Understanding and Using Course Content and EBP
10 pts
Excellent
The student understands significant ideas relevant to the issue or problem under discussion. This is indicated by correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point Information and knowledge are accurate The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, and evidence Two or more appropriate scholarly sources effectively utilized in the primary post. (One source may be a textbook). No internet sources cited
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Ideas are reasonably clear, but the listener needs to make some guesses as to what the student meant Some correct terminology utilized but discussion is fragmented Some vocabulary is used correctly and some is not Ideas are correct but not concise. Information and knowledge somewhat accurate Contributions to the discussion are generally supported by some facts, examples, analogies, statistics, and so forth, but there’s a sense that more is needed Evidence is only provided from the textbook. No scholarly peer reviewed journal articles cited or uses an internet source
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The student uses foundational knowledge incorrectly or explore the problem/issue thoroughly The student struggles to provide ideas or support for ideas Ideas are extremely limited or hard to understand The student has difficulty distinguishing main ideas and supporting details Terminology is used incorrectly. No citation of scholarly sources. Use of internet sources only
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Writing
Mechanics and APA
4 pts
Excellent
Writing has no spelling, grammatical, or APA errors, is organized, clear, and concise
Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Secure Original On Schedule